On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 20:11 -0500, John Ellson wrote:
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 21:43 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:29:07PM -0500, John Ellson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I gather from a 2004 thread in fedora-docs-list that the toolchain was
>>> moving to fop,
>>> but I don't see any fop yet in core or extras.
>>>
I grabbed the latest FOP trunk from svn, but it still seems to have
Sun
dependencies.
There is an C alternative to FOP:
http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/news.html
xmlroff (
http://xmlroff.org) is an XSL Formatter written in C that
produces PDF and PostScript. xmlroff 0.3.0 builds solely on open source
software since it no longer supports a PDFlib backend. It also plays
well with GNOME desktops since it uses Pango and the new PangoXSL
library
As I don't use XSLFO now, but I did in the past with FOP, I didn't test
this, but looks more attractive and lightweight (libxslt philosophy)
than FOP.
--
Marius Andreiana