On 11/04/2015 06:37 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
>>> I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
>>>> than the bootstrapping option (which will be
>>>> reverted from nfs-utils).
>> I think I've addressed these.
>>
>> But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and
>> autofs to ensure everything still builds properly when it's
>> reverted,
>> correct?
>>
> I already verified both fedfs-utils and autofs build without nfs
> -utils,
> but nfs-utils is still required to install fedfs-client and fedfs
> -server.
Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw.
It makes sense for fedfs-utils-client and fedfs-utils-server to require
nfs-utils doesn't it?
Yes... I think so...
steved.