On 10/09/2012 05:55 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 10/09/2012 05:19 PM, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
> get this straight: You want a group called "adm", presumably short for
> "administrator", the point of which is that it can view system things,
> but not actually *administer* them? Why on Earth call it "adm"?
Clearly, "adm" is short for "admonitor" :)
[which actually makes an odd bit of sense]
OK, then, I'll consider myself admonished.
--
J. Randall Owens |
http://www.ghiapet.net/