On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 11:34, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>Indeed I cannot find an official definition of the term Open Source as
>used for the Fedora Project on the Fedora Red Hat pages or on the Fedora
>US pages. It is probably a good idea to make explicit which definition
>is used.
We have discussed in the past using the intersection of the open source
definition from
opensource.org and the free software definition from
gnu.org, which means "only software the two major definitions agree is
open/free"
Thank you Havoc, that's exactly what I've been asking for. I would say
this should be reflected on
somewhere.
It is now clear to me that pine has no place in Fedora Core/Extras.
I'll see about publishing it on