On 04. 01. 21 12:26, Petr Menšík wrote:
I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it
intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I
departed to vacation. I haven't noticed that.
As a matter of opinion (i.e. this is not a policy, but my own views), I think
that the state of distgit should always be "good" and any provenpackager should
safely assume that rebuilding any package does not cause damage.
If I need to rebuild many packages because of a dependency, I should not need to
explore if the latest commits are "ready". A work in progress should be left in
a pull request.
Obviously, this does not always work, because sometimes change in distgit is
necessary for a rebuild from a side tag, but in most cases I think we should
avoid both "I've pushed a breaking upgrade but I haven't built it" or
"I've
pushed a broken commit and will push more later" approaches.
WDYT?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok