On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> Christopher Stone wrote:
>> On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>> It would be fantastic if the backend was more neutral like you said
>>> since there are people who might want to run any display manager with
>>> any desktop environment. Meanwhile, throwing around accusations instead
>>> of looking at what KDE maintainers as well as users want in Fedora is
>>> counter productive. Just a while back I was accused of having an agenda
>>> against KDE [1]. Now I get accused of having an agenda towards KDE [2].
>>> I guess, the next one to follow would be XFCE [3]. Others would accuse
>>> Red Hat of crippling KDE and the routine will continue. Next time,
>>> don't wonder why.
>>>
>>> Rahul
>>>
>>>
[
1]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-September/msg000...
>>>
>>>
[
2]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg02680...
>>>
>>> [
3]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/XfceLive
>> While I agree with what you have said in this thread, I certainly got
>> the impression you were doing everything within your means to avoid
>> having any kde games in the games spin. I really don't know why you
>> brought that up here, if you want to continue the discussion about the
>> games spin, please add to the thread on the games list or in private
>> with me. Thank you. Sheesh.
> I am uninterested in that discussion again. Generally people could be
> more courteous instead of throwing around accusations of bias without
> understanding the factors involved. We can do better.
I still do not understand why you brought it up again in this thread
especially in light of the fact that you are not interested in it.
To make another related point. Nothing personal with you.
Rahul