On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:47 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> Tangent nit-pick... Once an update has been created for a
branch, why not
> at least allow it to go to stable? Seeing my packages stuck in testing
for
> eternity bothers my OCD until I push enough updates I don't see it
anymore.
We could push all the testing updates stable at the end... but...
that means there would be a flood of changes of things that didn't meed
testing requirements, and additionally we could never fix any problems
that happen because of that.
Perhaps it would be better to unpush all the pending ones at eol?
Well, what I envision is more of shutting down builds first, and then
updates later, more of a staged response instead of shutting everything
down at one time.
Thanks,
Richard