On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:42:57AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>> Are there even any metrics about how many bad updates happened? For me
>> bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions
>> with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed
>> down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to
>> use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to
>> stable.
>
> Actually the proposal is time AND test coverage.
I mind have misunderstood it, but afaics it only says that it will be
tested, because it spent time in updates-testing, but this is not even
true nowadays, even if packages stay long in updates-testing.
Having more time opens us up to more testing days and in the near future
autoqa to help us bounce obviously bad things.
-sv