On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire
in
branched (prior to freeze) and up to master...
But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum
that was discovered here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506
This is the bug raised with my package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342249
It seems very unintuitive to the user, and wasn't initially apparent to me
until I look at all open dnf bugs and did a "find on page" for
"obsolete"
For now I've opened a rel-eng ticket to get the letsencrypt packages
properly removed from the F23 repos so that a dnf install letsencrypt, like
F24 behaviour, will install certbot.
I guess the real question is - is the dnf behaviour correct, and if the dnf
behaviour isn't going to change should we allow packagers to retire from a
released branch?
The DNF behavior is not correct, as something that has a Provides line
should be considered equivalent, even if it also has an Obsoletes
line. Since this is *not* how DNF behaves currently, it should be
corrected ASAP.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!