Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.
I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that
they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I
could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded,
but I chose not to.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e...
However, the package still doesn’t build:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
In fact:
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
[…]
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
It seems like the problem is here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73
Requires: %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
where “upstream” is “libgda”.
On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
> ------------------------------------------------
> in your fear, seek only peace
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini
<decathorpe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
>> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>
>>> I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to
6.0.0.
>>>
>>> The following packages are impacted.
>>>
>>> If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with
libgda5-devel.
>>>
>>> anjuta
>>> elementary-music
>>> gtranslator
>>> libgdamm
>>> sequeler
>> Hi Gwyn,
>>
>> I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
>> looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab...
>> The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
>> wrong contents.
>>
>> And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
>> elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
>> superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages)
generated by
>> the two follow-up commits ...
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31...
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16...
>>
>> Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds :)
>>
>> Fabio
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue