On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 20:16 -0400, Paul Frields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 7:53 PM Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:39 pm, Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com>
> wrote:
> > Is the FOSS position adequately represented on the Council?
>
> From my reading of [1], the Council decision is that we use FOSS in
> our infrastructure except where it is "not viable and not available."
> In the case of dist-git, it seems undeniable that FOSS is both viable
> and available (whether it's Pagure or GitLab CE). Council hasn't
> actually approved a move to a proprietary version of GitLab yet afaik.
>
> [1]
>
>
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/council/council.2020-04-01-14...
For a solution to be viable it needs to meet requirements.
Sure. That's just a re-statement of the question. Are there Fedora
requirements here which are met by proprietary Gitlab but not by Gitlab
CE or Pagure?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net