Dne 15.11.2010 23:04, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:01:30PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org>
>> wrote:
> Leaving the retracing at the user's end of things means that the user at
> least has a choice in the matter - I'm unlikely to submit any firefox
> crashes if I don't have an opportunity to look at what's in the
> backtrace. We can make symbols available for local tracing without
> forcing the user to download the entirity of the debuginfo, and that
> would seem a more reasonable approach.
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DebuginfoFS
Agreed, debuginfofs will be better for many scenarios.
Major advantage of the retrace server is that you can get a good
backtraces even from unfresh coredumps.
And why can't this be done with debuginfofs ? It's the same data.
--
Nicolas Mailhot