Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> I wouldn't be surprised if whatever script is used to do the mass
> closings
> does a first pass generating the list of bugs that need closing, and
> then does
> a second pass closing them unconditionally. If someone changes the
> bug info
> between those two passes the script wouldn't notice. And figuring
> that there
> were probably thousand of bugs closed, it could very well take the
> script
> hours to run.
Exactly. The script uses CSV generated from Bugzilla in one time but
as the script runs nearly for a day, conflicts can happen...
I seem to recall that I've seen Bugzilla detect and warn about
conflicting concurrent changes. It would seem like a good idea to have
the script use that mechanism.
Björn Persson