On 07/07/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Thomas, the real question here is this: If a package wants to install
> (and maintain) its own set of firewalld service definitions, is the
> approach Stef took the best one? If so, we should submit a Packaging
> Guidelines edit to the FPC and get this codified where others can find
> it.
>
Yes, this is the best approach right now.
Hmm. If I've made a temporary change to my firewall settings, I might
be a bit annoyed if an (apparently unrelated) package installation
caused the configuration to revert to the permanent configuration.
Is there not a more specific command that adds the service definition to
the current environment without a full reload?
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com
Sent from the cloud -- where it's already tomorrow
========================================================================