On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
There is an Online Docs group that has the -docs subpackage for many of
the system-config-* packages. It uses conditionals which are painful,
but would be a way for more -docs subpackages to be visible, and if the
user wishes to have local documentation, if available, for the packages
they've chosen, they can pick that group.
The group name is a bit... wrong, but maybe a group of people that care
about documentation could help come up with a better name, and help to
ensure that all the available -docs packages get listed in this group.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:16 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Feel free to rename if you have a more suitable idea, though. If there
> is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well.
The existence of the group is fine, and it should probably grow. The
problem is the name. "Online" at least here in the states means on the
internet, so "Online Docs" would mean documents that your read via the
Internet. "Offline Docs" is almost more correct but still a bit
awkward. Anyway, I don't really have good suggestions.
Suggestions:
"Local Documentation"
"Local Help Documents"