Le mercredi 26 mars 2008 à 12:39 -0500, Les Mikesell a écrit :
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com) said:
>>> Why not simplify the world and put everything in /bin and /usr/bin,
>>> making /sbin and /usr/sbin symlinks for backwards compatibility?
>>> Whatever purpose someone thought the s- versions might have ever served
>>> flies out the window when the the administrator and the only user are
>>> one and the same person who is just confused by sometimes having
>>> commands work and sometimes not.
>> Seems entirely reasonable.
>
> Because it's changing 500 packages, and you can't do the replacement
> sanely in RPM anyway.
Why does a package need to know if a directory is a symlink or not
unless it is the one that creates it?
Are we 100% sure there is no collision between /bin and /sbin contents
today ?
--
Nicolas Mailhot