Kevin Kofler wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> If there is none, it uses /bin/vi. In fact I have sone a bit of
> investigations and it uses, in pathnames.h _PATH_VI which is defined in
> /usr/invlude/paths.h.
>
> So it is a missing dependency, in my opinion.
No it's not. People may want to use an actually usable editor and not have
their system polluted with this relict of history.
I guess I should file bugs against cvs, sudo and fcron which all have
unnecessary Requires on vim-minimal.
I'd argue that vi should be a requirement on any unix-like system, just
in case it is visted by a unix administrator that is also a relic of
history.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com