On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno <greno(a)verizon.net> wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <greno(a)verizon.net> wrote:
>> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
>>
>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
> That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run
> the software you intended to run, which is impossible without
> SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid,
> the technology is or can be made solid.
No. The user is not in control here. Microsoft is in control.
Remove
Microsoft's keys, problem solved.
Mirek