On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 11:49 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:33, Warren Togami wrote:
>
http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/1398/
> As for the kernel I personally think 1398 is far less problematic for
> most folks than 1447. I copied all of the 1398 kernels for you here
> if you want to try that instead. Or maybe you should wait for a
> better new FC4 update kernel to hit the official tree.
If it's that bad, why didn't we rollback to 1398 after the discovery of
badness?
It's not bad for me :)