> Is Fedora a business-level distribution or not? If it is, then
fine,
> leave it in. But if it isn't, let us at least be honest about how few
> people at home and small/medium organizations are using it and
> reconsider our fascination and dedication to it.
Let's try your thought experiment on something more fundamental to
Fedora:
"Let's be honest about how few people at home and small/medium
organizations are using Linux and reconsider our fascination and
dedication to it."
Take that one step further. Fedora legacy is targeting RH 7.3 and RH 9.
What happens in a year or two or three or four when RH 7.3 and RH9 are
*FINALLY* truly dead. We're going to have to shove a stake in the ground
at a Fedora release and say "This is the new fedora legacy" and flagellate
'er support it for a few years as a production OS. I'd be pretty cranky if
I had to perform micro-surgery on a perfectly good distribution to add a
tool like kerberos (that should have been there in the first place).
/me pours a little gas on the fire...
/me rubs hands together...
-Chuck
-- Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
* Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
* Integration |
http://www.quantumlinux.com
* Support | chuckw(a)quantumlinux.com
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?