On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:06:49AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Bill
Nottingham<notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell (gmaxwell(a)gmail.com) said:
>> I doubt having consistently lower FP precision is anything many users
>> are asking for. The few that do can usually take care of themselves.
>
> And yet you say we should push them all to x86_64, which has
> the same lower precision?
>
>> > - More clearly delineates our support set of targets, sticking true
>> > to forwards innovation, not necessarily legacy support
>>
>> If thats the case why maintain x86 at all?
>
> Because it's 58% of our userbase (source: F11 torrent stats.)
Do we have any numbers on how many of this systems are x86_64 capable ?
If large parts of the world are walking around carrying 6 x CDs from
town to town, then we don't even have accurate stats for ix86 either.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw