Dne 25.3.2017 v 07:14 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL
>> maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much
>> of a big deal? And vice-versa?
> Well, I don't want to get the EPEL bugs assigned to me.
And you would not get them so, everything is fine \ó/
So the POC as it it now would be preserved? Or there would be POC for
Fedora and POC for EPEL?
Currently I typically confirms just ACLs for Rawhide, but after
branching, the Rawhide maintainer becomes maintainer of the latest
stable branch as well. I think this nicely corresponds with gained
experiences of the package maintainer and it might help a bit to keep
stable branches stable. OTOH, with PR, I think that the number of
co-maintainers might drop.
Nevertheless, except the notifications and bug assignments, I don't mind
much if there are ACL per branch or not.
Vít