On 02/06/2012 09:25 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
> have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
> on the viability of moving forward with the Btrfs as default feature,
> whether we actually want to make a push for it or leave it for F18.
There's been a couple of concerns raised about btrfs's resiliance
against local attacks (forced hash collisions and the like) - is local
hardening something that's been on the test plan so far?
Would be useful to know the status of important Btrfs issues
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689509) as well
Rahul