On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:17 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yes, there should. For _all_ architectures, not just secondary
> architectures. (In fact, the whole distinction between primary and
> secondary architectures is IMHO a bad idea and should be dropped).
David, you keep saying this, and its rather unproductive and insulting.
Please, take the needle off your broken record.
No. It was relevant in the context; Tom was talking about facilities
which should be available for Fedora on secondary architectures when he
should have been including _all_ architectures.
Yet again, the artificial and ill-defined distinction was confusing.
--
dwmw2