On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Dan HorĂ¡k wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > > > >Some OCaml spec files do the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
> > > > >
> > > > >This is always incorrect for several reasons:
> >
> > Is %{ocaml_arches} used for anything?
> >
> > In case not, maybe better to remove it?
>
> I've removed it completely. I'm updating the packages which
> used this macro.
>
> (Unfortunately my original email on this subject is stuck in a
> moderator queue, so I've attached it here.)
But do you still need to bootstrap ocaml on the non-native arches to
get the bytecode interpreted one? Or is simply a build? I'm asking
because s390x as you could guess :-)
Just a straight build should work. If the build fail(s/ed) on s390x
can you point me to that, and I'll take a look.
I'd *really* love someone to write a s390x native backend! That would
complete the set.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
http://libguestfs.org