On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 17:38 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Stephen Snow [16/02/2022 11:21] :
>
> Perhaps the automation should
> do
> just that, demote primary packager (from owner to co-maintainer) if
> inactive for over a year and promote the main supporter for the
> year to
> be the owner from co-maintainer.
Can you define "main supporter"?
I was supposing in this case it is a FAS account user who is
coincidentally a main packager or maintainer, and main supporter would
be in this case a co-maintainer who is actively doing the maintanence
instead (or maybe a FAS holder submitting PR solutions repeatedly?).
Because, old accounts should be able to have reduced privileges after a
certain period of inactivity I would think, but I am reluctant to
advocate removing users simply for inactivity since that state can as
easily change without notice to the communty necessarily.
But maybe I miss the point of the original idea, since there also seems
to be a tie in to how secure the build system is which to me is a
different discussion, with some overlap of functional outcome.
Stephen
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure