On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:02:51AM -0500, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> No, because updates may depend on previous updates to work
properly. We
> can't possibly test or support all possible combinations of updates.
We can't _now_ ... because of packagers like you who want to release
lots of updates with no or almost no testing!
Afaics, nobody objected to test updates more. But afaics they only
support so far is %check in SPEC builds, which is not much support after
all. But with AutoQA this will become better.
If we had less updates, that changed less things and required more
testing before pushing them to users ... this would be entirely
possible.
Less updates mean more changes per update or you have more buggy
packages, because updates usually fix bugs.
Regards
Till