On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 05:32 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:53 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> We should change or refine the Freeze Policy page then. Having different
>> definitions of what is required for alpha to go out and what can go in
>> after alpha leads to incorrect expectations on the part of developers.
>
> I agree. I think probably all we need to do is remove the weasel-word
> 'testable' and give a more solid definition there.
Well, the Freeze Policy page is about targets feature owners should meet,
not about Alpha blockers.
Sure, but 'testable' is equally meaningless in both contexts.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net