On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 00:02 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
Erwin Rol <mailinglists(a)erwinrol.com> wrote:
[...]
> Sometimes you wish that ppl writing things like OOo would pay as much
> attention to output quality as Donald Knuth :-/
Problem is that "that other office package" couldn't care less about
output
quality, and many OOo users insist on pixel-exact rendering of the produced
junk...
We are talking about documents written with OOo 2.0.2 and opened with
OOo 2.0.3 or even OOo 2.0.2 of a few updates later, that "other office
package" I have not used for years and years (before OOo I used LaTeX).
It is simply not acceptable when Documents written on the same computer
look different after some minor (OOo 2.0.2 -> OOo 2.0.2 + bugfix)
updates look different. And worse, the documents look OK again when
opened by OOo on "that other OS".
- Erwin