On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
<akurtako(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change to Java
11 as a default?
Speaking for myself, yes.
I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on
this or something like that), but from conversations we've had I
gather that all active package maintainers are looking forward to
finally getting Java 11 by default.
Yes, despite many soon FTBFS and thus soon orphaned pkgs, It looks taht active people wish
to
proceed with change, rather then doing the possibly clumsy step back.
I'm progressing toward the mass rebuild in side tag.
I'm aware about three packages needing commits to change - java-11-openjdk,
java-1.8.0-openjdk and
javapackages-tools.
Fabio, saying "you have not got xmvn change", Is tere something I need to check
for?
Thanx!
J.
Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek(a)redhat.com M: +420775390109