On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:23 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Arjan van de Ven (arjan(a)fenrus.demon.nl) said:
> I really like this idea; it's a simple "cat" and it can be done at a
> time where latency doesn't matter... (even in cron.daily)
>
> Oh... this opens more options. This also allows the "sort by
> blocknumber" to be done at this point and taken out of the critical
> latency part......
>
> great idea!
Of course, that then makes shutdown take twice as long.
if you do it at shutdown, which is again a latency path :)
cron.daily/weekly is less so ;)