Am 28.03.2012 17:58, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald
<h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
> if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as
> broken by design
Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel
list, but you don't seem to get the message (or you're actively
choosing to ignore it), so I'm going to say it again as clearly as I
can. The universe of Fedora development doesn't revolve around you.
Development involves a fair amount of group consensus, but as in any
meritocracy -- people are more likely to have their opinions valued
and listened to when they're willing to take an active role in the
process, rather than playing Monday-morning quarterback (an American
term, sorry) or complaining about things after the fact.
sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda
>> should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything
>> else to kickstart non-graphical installations
this would mean you have from DVD only a "click, click" default
install and for every setup wihich is not default you have to
deal with kickstart
do you really think this is a good idea and improvement of
the installer in any way?
complaining about things after the fact
and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact
like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem
with this message of me in the context - really!