-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jerry James schrieb:
I'm working on getting GCL to run again. The current Debian
patch
(which is enormous) fixes most problems, but not the long-running
SELinux problem that GCL has had. I took a hint from a thread on this
list a couple of months ago. I let make run until it crashed due to a
denied mprotect() call, did chcon -t java_exec_t on the binaries, and
restarted the make. It completed successfully. I can patch the
makefile to do the chcon call in the right place, but I'm worried
about getting the right security context on installation now. First,
is using java_exec_t in this way acceptable? Second, if so, how do I
ask for Fedora's policy to reflect that: bugzilla, request on this
list, some other list? Thanks,
There should be a fedora-selinux-list mailing
list.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkkR+FgACgkQT2AHK6txfgycTwCgtNdtJispTMx+9LdFqVz1wipC
Di4AoJPvs50m0NrSlLI+U20VqIfDb9Fz
=DywW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----