> > It will take longer to public to
fedora.redhat.com --
we'll need a
> > proper CMS to do that for reasons involving infrastructure (pushing
> > web site content is currently too heavyweight a process for that to
> > work). It's still a good idea, though. :-)
>
> So are you saying that
http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/cms/ isn't a
> "proper CMS"? :)
reasons why it doesn't seem like a real cms to me:
1. source code is included - but under what license?
2. it's in java
3. it's in java
4. The Red Hat CMS approach can have a company running a content
management system in as little as two months. - umm - 2months?
While we're talking about CMS, has anyone ever looked at Callisto?
http://www.callistocms.com/
-Chuck
--
Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
* Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
* Integration |
http://www.quantumlinux.com
* Support | chuckw(a)quantumlinux.com
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?