On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 17:24 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
now rpmguard does various other things, so we'd need to filter
out the
provision-removed (especially) results for this case. But we do at least
have this information being captured by autoqa, I think.
Erm, by 'filter out' (terrible choice of words) what I really meant is
that, to catch unannounced dependency bumps but not anything else, we
should look *only* at 'provision-removed' and 'provision-added' results,
and ignore everything else. You could further process the results and
look only for results with .so.[0-9] in them, I suppose.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net