On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw
<hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> writes:
RS> Yes. If the informal review is for an existing packager then,
RS> there's no guarantee that a sponsor will even see that informal
RS> review because there's no requirement for a sponsor to approve the
RS> review request in that scenario.
You must have misunderstood. Any chance you could re-read what I wrote,
noting "for the packages you have submitted" where you seem to have
replaced the last word with "reviewed".
To be painfully verbose, you include the relevant information in _your_
ticket. As in:
Here's my new package submission. I need a sponsor. Please note
that I'm a long-time Fedora ambassador and am the upstream developer
for this software. Please also see the following informal reviews I
have done:
link to ticket 1
link to ticket 2
Yes, that's certainly one way to do it, and is even mentioned in the
"How to get sponsored" wiki[1]:
"Go ahead and link to other package review requests where you've left
comments and reviews (More on reviews below)."
but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of
documentation/guidelines there are.
Richard
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_grou...