On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris <xchris89x(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik <josef(a)toxicpanda.com>:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl>
wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> >> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> >> > +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
>>> >> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise
distro.
>>> >
>>> > For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-only
support
>>> > is provided for migrating to btrfs.
>>> >
>>>
>>> That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
>>
>> [citation needed]
>>
>
>
https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
According to the stab-o-matic stability testing framework[1] btrfs
scores a 63 whereas ext4 scores a 37, so yes, I'm completely serious,
Josef
[1] credit goes to Sandeen for that one.