On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:02:57AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I don't see a problem with different set of blocking desktops for
ARM, even
as primary architecture. But it's really about resources - do we have people
willing to work for example on LXDE (I'd say more resources friendly for
current ARMs) - not saying there are no people, but more to support it as
blocking desktop, if QA would be able to validate three desktops on two
different platforms... And as we try to avoid "default" world in Fedora now,
let's have LXDE "default" in some cases.
I do. Fedora is a Linux distribution that has a specific set of software
available, and runs a specific desktop by default. We have a process
whereby people can produce Fedora variants with different defaults, and
we release those as spins. If ARM wants to be *Fedora*, it should behave
identically to the other Fedora architectures. If ARM merely wants to be
able to produce something that's similar to Fedora then we should figure
out what a spin-based PA would look like, but that's not what's
currently being proposed.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org