On the same note, when the new (2.9.x) panel for gnome was built,
someone it seems forgot to reenable the eds stuff. I do use it.
Trever
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 13:22 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 10:11 -0600, Edginton, Brian (GE Healthcare)
wrote:
> I think there needs to be some discussion about keeping, at least packages in the
same general family, sync'd with each other in rawhide. I know this horse has been
beating to near death but it certainly interferes with comprehensive testing and getting
the feedback necessary to move fedora forward.
>
> Case in point, evolution and evolution-data-server move forward to 2.1.4 in rawhide.
Evolution-connector lags behind, because of it's dependencies on old libgal,
libe*'s, etc.
> So now in this test environment mail is completely useless.
>
> Is there a way to encourage, or preferably enforce, keeping the wavefront coherent?
>
> edge
>
If you have an important workstation/server, you really shouldn't be
running from Rawhide. Things get out of sync, break, get your cat
pregnant, etc. all the time. You can't expect real stability until the
few weeks prior to release when everything freezes and the various
glitches are worked out. If there was any mandate to keep Rawhide
stable at all times, it would be the equivalent of production and they
would have to put out Beta/RC releases for Rawhide! Then we'd never see
anything go anywhere.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list --
"If there was strife and contention in the home, very little else in
life could compensate for it." -- Lawana Blackwell, The Courtship of the
Vicar's Daughter, 1998