On 08/29/2013 01:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)laiskiainen.org> wrote:
...snip...
> Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
:)
I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
folks. ;(
Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling
faster.
>> Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's
>> breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too.
>
> Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for
> overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some
> extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting
> scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing
> potentially destabilizing updates :)
Exactly.
kevin
I'm not saying this was a bad idea, but the Koji developers now have to
test on both RHEL 6 and Fedora now. Let this message serve as a warning
to them if they did not already know. ;)
- Jay