On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> But yes, backwards incompatible changes suck, although in this
case
> setterm has historically done something non-standard.
setterm --foreground white --bold --background blue --blank 59
--store
produces nearly the same error message:
setterm: argument error: --background
Note that the argument the message apparently applies to is neither first
nor last.
Only this works:
setterm --foreground white --background blue --bold on
You need to put the relevant color the the proper place, I think it's
order dependant:
"--foreground white"
"--background blue"
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me