On 23.09.2008 20:15, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 23.09.2008 19:58, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 19:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Just wondering and making sure I get this right: What exactly do you
>> mean by "changed" in the latter sentence?
>>
>> (1) just use the same ids and description and list only the packages
>> from RPM Fusion in the rpmfusion comps.xml files
>>
>> (2) import the whole comps.xml stuff from Fedora, keep it in sync and
>> add the RPM Fusion packages
>>
>> I suppose you meant (1)?
> I think I misspoke on the translation side, that likely doesn't matter.
> James gave a better description of what happened.
>
> I'd recommend using 1 if you want your packages to show up along side
> other Fedora packages in the same groups.
I'll give it a try in RPM Fusions devel branch; we can easily switch it
back later if needed.
Done, but only for the "free" repo for now; new comps can be found for
review in CVS for RPM Fusion:
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/comps/comps-f10.xml.in?root=free&view...
File is on the way to the repo and should be available at
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/<arch>/os/co...
in a few minutes.
James, Jesse, does that look like it should look like?
Some questions:
- Should I better remove the fields "<_name>",
"<_description>"
"<default>" and "<uservisible>" to avoid mixing up what
comes from
Fedora's comps.xml?
- I don't define any category's; is that okay?
CU
knurd