On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:16:18PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:49:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Though, in theory, fewer updates means a higher percentage of them can be
> >> tested which means quality goes up.
> >
> > Even if this might start another flamewar ... I like the idea of
> > having less updates.
> >
> > The "the version number changed so we need to update the fedora
> > package" attitude needs to stop.
>
> May I ask why? Can you elaborate on why there is such a "need"? Who
> "need's this?
I hope people who are not the targeted audience of Fedora, because the
four foundations of Fedora (“Freedom, Friends, Features, First”) include
"first.
lots of people. Some want to review changes manually and udpate only
"important"
things,
Imho it is easier to review small changes than big changes.
Others don not have gigabit internet access all around the clock. I
am trying to update
my Netbook over a mobile connection as I write this.
But why do you want to update your Netbook anyhow? And with yum-presto
the demand for high speed internet access is not that big.
Regards
Till