On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:14:39AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On 10/23/2009 07:01 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It was (mostly) ignored because it doubles the download size and makes the
> image no longer fit on a CD, for little benefit.
Yes. It is a "solution" which adds costs in many, many places for a
problem that doesn't exist. I don't see why people even spend a second
thinking about this.
For me it would be useful to have a simple way to make a USB
installation device for both my 32bit and 64bit machines. Also a single
rescue system for both 64bit and 32bit machines would be nice.