On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 00:32 +0100, Leon wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:38:19 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Leon (sdl.web(a)gmail.com) said:
>> > In contrast to your experience, I've always found latex/dvips to be
>> > smoother and less error prone than pdflatex. And to agree with your
>> > other point, xdvi is definitely the best DVI viewer. Viewing the .dvi
>>
>> What about Active-DVI¹. It's the one recommended by whizzytex².
>
> Objective CAML???? :)
Just want to show there is something better than xdvi :-)
I just made an rpm for advi and tried it out. It is certainly not better
than xdvi. For example, it doesn't support virtual fonts, which is
pretty essential nowadays.
--
Gérard Milmeister
Langackerstrasse 49
CH-8057 Zürich