Brendan Conoboy (blc(a)redhat.com) said:
On 07/11/2013 10:41 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>Kernel, glibc, all the core library stacks. And I would argue that yes, this
>*includes* libGL. So llvmpipe needs fixed, outside of any desktops. Should
>we define the core functionality better? Probably.
I would argue that it does not include libGL because it's not a
requirement for headless deployment scenarios. Why would you argue
for it?
Well, as I said (and you cut out)
...
I do know what some people want ARM to be in terms of dense
hypserscale servers (32/64-bit)... but the community that would be using
Fedora ARM does seem to be targeting a wider array than that.
...
The F19 ARM release released 5 desktop images. You seem to be arguing that
the required featureset of ARM as a primary arch should only be for headless
deployment, but the ARM community itself is saying otherwise.
Bill