On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten
<py(a)luyten.fr> wrote:
> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like
> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
>
> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1 karma, and
> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good reminder like
> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have made less
> mistakes
>
> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal would not save
> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt
There is already a perfect example of this.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-...
This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma.
If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to
give it negative karma.