-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating schrieb:
There was recent discussion (on IRC) that some felt a full
re-review as "overkill" or worse "a waste of time". I think
it's
fair to re-evaluate what we're trying to accomplish with a
re-review and re-assess if a full review is indeed what "we" (IE
the Fedora community, represented by FESCo) want.
Be in mind, as long as you don't rename you package, you can make any
changes on your package
without you need a review for it. Question: Why you need a full
review, if you want to rename your
package?
Of course, you can say, that you want to be sure, that you don't want
to get a naming conflict due
the renaming of the package and have the right Provides/Obsoletes
statements in the renamed
package to be sure to have a proper updating path. But this is not a
full review from my pont of
view.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAklKkmoACgkQT2AHK6txfgyI0gCaAxM1kZEgKEnK0nJiRvBiZ+WD
OCoAoNtKHLC2qvgRtAF3WeuSOJmS6Y0b
=zrfw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----