On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:17:14PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The issues reported against libvirt all appear to be false positives.
> Not entirely surprising since we already have coverity run against
> libvirt code nightly.
>
Thanks for the quick response. Does Red Hat run it only for packages in
RHEL or it is run against all Fedora packages? If not, would it be
possible for Red Hat to do so and publish the results on a regular basis?
That might be a useful service.
I'm not sure what is done for general RHEL/Fedora scans. The libvirt
team just have a setup which lets us run it against our upstream GIT
repos nightly.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|