On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
This is the problem with arguing about a proposal that hasn't
even been
written yet. You latch onto the one part you assume will be there that
is the most unreasonable, and use that as a tool to bash the entire
concept of the proposal (which hasn't been written yet). I'm sure there
is a Latin phrase for this, I just don't know it.
He's created a strawman and is arguing against it.
that's the logical fallacy.
-sv